Like the Escort EXP, the Probe was a car that had a lot of hype coming out of Detroit. Positioned to be a replacement for the Mustang, the Probe was supposedly going to be the sports car of the future. Some would liken the looks of the original Probe to the BMW 850li, it even got the moniker of the “poor man’s BMW.” But when it came down to reliability, the Probe was less than favorable with quite a few recalls right after the initial launch.
The second generation of the Probe offered a more modern look but still failed to impress the critics. Ford went ahead and released the Probe alongside the Mustang and the sales never amounted to much. Ford had invested millions of dollars into the design of the Probe only to lose the money and cancel the nameplate by the late 1990s.
Like it or not, Ford had a working relationship with Kia Motors in the 1990s. The fruits of this relationship were the Ford Festiva and the Ford Aspire. Competing directly with the Geo Metro, the Aspire was notoriously unreliable and just plain ugly. GM dominated the subcompact market with the Geo Metro up until 2001 and Ford just lost money with the Aspire.
The Aspire was such a bad car that you can’t even find replacement parts for it anymore. These compact gems are few and far between now, a relic of cheap 1990s transportation at its finest. There were two body styles to the Aspire, a four-door wagon, and a two-door hatchback. The 1990s weren’t exactly a great time for Ford and the Aspire is evidence of this.
Every automaker was trying to get on the oval bandwagon of the 1990s, but it was Ford who took it too far. The overtly oval design of the 1990s model Taurus didn’t sit well with consumers, who had grown accustomed to a fairly moderate design. Ford took a radical approach to the redesign of the car and it was more extreme than GM had done with the Aurora. The new generation of the Taurus was not a bad car, but drivers just couldn’t look past the design.
It was about as unconventional as you could get, and sometimes that isn’t a good thing when it comes to a family sedan. Ford tried to spruce things up with an appearance package and chrome rims, but it just wasn’t enough to bolster sales. Reliability issues plagued this generation of the Taurus as well and that didn’t help things out.
To boost the likeability of the Taurus brand in the 1990s, Ford attempted a performance model of the oval Taurus. This variation of the SHO had a V8 engine sourced from Yamaha. The performance was more than adequate but it wasn’t enough to bolster the brand during this period.
The Yamaha V8 had a lot of reliability issues and the car became more of a lemon than a collector’s item. The SHO was generally a well-liked brand but what happened with this generation tarnished it forever. You’d think that putting a V8 powerplant in a Taurus would be a fun thing to do, but the reality is it wasn’t.
Another interesting but poorly-received SVT model from the 1990s was the Ford Contour. Although it didn’t have a V8 engine like the larger Taurus, it did have some pretty decent driving characteristics. Unfortunately, the price of the Contour made it a questionable purchase for most consumers. The size ratio was about the same as a Ford Escort and drivers just couldn’t see driving it.
The suspension was tuned for performance, but at the end of the day, it wasn’t impressive enough to justify the price tag. Ford lost a great deal of money on the Contour SVT and the Contour brand in a generation. The car was about the same size as the Escort without providing anything new.
The SUV boom was in full swing by the early 2000s and the Ford Aviator was an interesting concept. Lincoln had hit a home run with the Navigator a few years earlier but the Aviator was not as well received. Based on the Ford Explorer the Aviator was undersized and had a full-size price tag, which didn’t sit well with luxury buyers.
One cool feature about the Aviator was the fact that the SUV shared its powertrain with the Mustang Mach-1. Performance was more than you’d expect for an SUV of this size, but that wasn’t enough to bolster sales. The Aviator is perhaps one of the poorest selling Lincoln models in recent time and that isn’t a good thing.
Ford was riding so high on the tailwinds of the popular Lincoln Navigator that the company decided to launch the Blackwood. A truck that was based on the F-150, it had some interesting features. The truck bed was unusable as it was lined with satin, and a tonneau cover made sure that you weren’t able to use it.
The performance wasn’t much better than your plumber’s F-150, and the truck didn’t drive very refined at all. There was only a four-door configuration available, and the truck looked downright weird from the back. The Blackwood could have been an interesting concept, but it seems like the designers got carried away.
The SVT boys were getting carried away with the performance designs at the end of the 1990s. The Focus SVT was another interesting car that got a lot of press coverage at the time. As a brand, the Focus was very popular in the rally scene around the world, which made Ford consider a sports car that could be sold domestically.
The overall design of the Focus SVT had a lot of potential, but when it came down to the nuts and bolts it was all the same. The car had a higher price tag and would compete directly with the Civic Si, but the final product wasn’t on the same level. You’ll still find these used from time to time, although they’ve been fairly abused.
As if the Blackwood wasn’t a bad enough failure, Lincoln decided to try things again with the Mark LT. The large truck was overly luxurious in all the wrong ways, although at least this time it had a functional truck bed. The basic premise of the truck was once again to make a luxury version of the F-150. Buyers weren’t enthused by this and the Mark LT had a fairly lackluster run.
The high price tag coupled with the F-150 looks just wasn’t enough to entice most truck buyers. Not to mention the fact that all of that added luxury just makes things more expensive to replace. Traditional F-150 drivers enjoy the truck’s long history of durability and the Mark LT just couldn’t offer that kind of dependability.